ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-1999-03347-2
		INDEX CODE:  110.00

		COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to a general discharge.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant received a UOTHC discharge on 14 December 1983 for a Pattern of Discreditable Involvement with Military or Civil Authorities after 1 year, 7 months, and 25 days on active duty.

On 19 January 2000, the applicant submitted an application requesting that his discharge be upgraded to a general discharge for medical reasons.

The applicant’s request was considered and denied by the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) on 29 August 2000 (Exhibit E).

On 30 May 2005, the applicant submitted a request for reconsideration, again requesting that his discharge be upgraded to a general discharge for medical reasons.  To support this assertion, the applicant provided a Readmission Psychosocial History and Assessment document.  The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit F.

Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Clarksburg, West Virginia, provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit G.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.  After reviewing the previous documentation and noting the additional documentation submitted, we again are not convinced that the applicant’s request should be granted.  We find no impropriety in the characterization of applicant's discharge.  It appears that responsible officials applied appropriate standards in effecting the separation, and we do not find persuasive evidence that pertinent regulations were violated or that applicant was not afforded all the rights to which entitled at the time of discharge.  We conclude, therefore, that the discharge proceedings were proper and characterization of the discharge was appropriate to the existing circumstances.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we again find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the additional evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the applicant was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 28 February 2006, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit E.	Record of Proceedings, dated 31 Aug 00,
				w/atchs.
	Exhibit F.	DD Form 149, dated 30 May 05,
				w/atchs.
	Exhibit G.	FBI Investigative Report.