ADDENDUM TO

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS





IN THE MATTER OF: 	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2001-02811

					

   					COUNSEL:  NONE



		HEARING DESIRED: YES







APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:



His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be 

upgraded to a general (under honorable conditions).





STATEMENT OF FACTS:



On 6 March 2002, the Board considered and denied the applicant’s 

request that his discharge be upgraded to general (under 

honorable conditions).  For an accounting of the facts and 

circumstances surrounding the applicant’s separation and the 

rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record 

of Proceedings, with attachments, at Exhibit F.



In an application dated 20 June 2014, the applicant seeks 

reconsideration of his earlier request.  He states court-martial 

proceedings were never offered and a civilian conviction is an 

improper condition of a military discharge.  His Vermont Army 

National Guard time was never considered.



The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 

Exhibit G.



On 8 September 2014, a request for information pertaining to his 

post-service activities was forwarded to the applicant for 

review and response within 30 days (Exhibit H).  As of this 

date, no response has been received by this office.





THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:



1.  In earlier findings, the Board determined there was 

insufficient evidence to warrant any corrective action.  After 

thoroughly reviewing the additional documentation submitted in 

support of this appeal and the evidence of record, we do not 

believe the applicant has overcome the rationale expressed in 

the previous decision.  Therefore, we do not find the additional 

evidence presented is sufficient to warrant the relief sought on 

that basis.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 

no basis upon which to recommend favorable consideration of the 

applicant’s request.



2.  The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not 

been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel 

will materially add to our understanding of the issues involved.  

Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably 

considered.





THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:



The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 

demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the 

application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 

application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 

newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 

application.





The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 

Number BC-2001-02811 in Executive Session on 28 May 2015, under 

the provisions of AFI 36-2603:





The following documentary evidence was considered:



   Exhibit F.  Record of Proceedings, dated 18 March 2002,

	w/atchs.

   Exhibit G.  DD Form 149, dated 20 June 2014, w/atchs.

   Exhibit H.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 September 2014.







1