ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:				DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2002-03011-2
				INDEX CODE:  100.03

							COUNSEL:  NONE

							HEARING DESIRED: NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His reenlistment (RE) code be changed from an RE code of 2C, reenlistment ineligible, to any RE code that begins with the number 1, reenlistment eligible.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS

On 9 April 2003, the applicant's request to have his RE code changed from “2C” to an RE code that would enable him to reenlist was considered and denied by the Board.  For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s request, and, the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit G.

On 17 October 2005, the applicant submitted a request for reconsideration contending his discharge was wrong in that he was not given a hearing or an opportunity to explain.  He contends his service was exceptional.  To support his request, he has provided a personal statement, a statement from his supervisor at Northrup Grumman, a copy of his college transcript and a copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit H. 

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

After again reviewing this application and the evidence provided in support of his appeal, we remain unpersuaded that the applicant’s RE code should be changed to one that would allow him to reenlist.  We carefully considered the statements provided by the applicant and while we believe the evidence to be new and relevant, it is not of such significance as to alter our original decision.  As previously noted, the applicant has provided no evidence to show his discharge and the corresponding RE code he received was erroneous or unjust.  Accordingly, the applicant’s request is not favorably considered.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 22 February 2006, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	XXXX X. XXXX, Panel Chair
	XXXX X. XXXX, Member
	XXXX X. XXXX, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit G.  Record of Proceedings, dated 12 Mar 03,
			 with exhibits A through F.
    Exhibit H.  Applicant’s Letter, dated 6 Feb 05, w/atchs.

                                   XXXX X. XXXX
							Panel Chair