RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2003-02119
				INDEX CODE:  111.00

				COUNSEL:  None

				HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His Company Grade Officer Performance Report (OPR) for the period 31 July 2001 through 12 June 2002 be corrected to reflect:

		a.  Section III Job Description - 1. Duty Title should read Wing Flight Safety Officer/KC 135R/T Instructor Pilot.

		b.  Section III Job Description - 2. Key, Duties, Tasks, and Responsibilities last line should read Leads Operational Risk Management (ORM) program.  Maintains currency as a mission-ready KC-135R/T Instructor Pilot.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His 12 June 2002 OPR should be corrected to change his duty title and add text in the last line of Section III, Key Duties, Task, and Responsibilities.

He further states that his OPR references several times about his qualifications as an instructor pilot and also recommends he should be upgraded to a Evaluator Pilot.

Applicant's complete submission, with attachment, is attached at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant is currently serving on active duty in the grade of captain.

The applicant did not appeal the contested OPR under the provisions of AFI 36-2401, Correcting Officer and Enlisted Evaluations Reports.

Applicant’s OPR profile as a captain is listed below.

			PERIOD ENDING		OVERALL EVALUATION

			  2 May 00 		Meets Standards
			 30 Jul 01		Meets Standards
			*12 Jun 02		Meets Standards

*Contested OPR

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ AFPC/DPPPE states the applicant has not provided any evidence to support his request to have his duty title changed and to add text to his 12 June 2002 OPR, nor has he provided any documentation from his chain of command supporting that the contested report should be changed.  Based on the evidence provided, AFPC/DPPPE recommends the applicant’s request be denied.

A complete of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR STAFF EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 28 August 2003, for review and response within 30 days.  As of this date, no response has been received by this office.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.	The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.	The application was timely filed.

3.	Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are unpersuaded that relief should be granted.  Applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, we do not find these assertions, in and by themselves, sufficiently persuasive to override the rationale provided by the office of the Air Force.  The applicant has not provided any persuasive evidence to support his request to have his duty title changed and to add text to the last line of the OPR in question.  Nor has he provided any documentation from his rating chain supporting the report be changed.  We therefore adopt the Air Force's rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has failed to sustain his burden that he has suffered either an error or an injustice.  Hence, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2003-02119 in Executive Session on 7 October 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36‑2603:

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.	DD Form 149, dated 17 Jun 03, w/atch.
	Exhibit B.	Applicant's Officer Selection Brief.
	Exhibit C.	Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPPE, dated 23 Aug 03.
	Exhibit D.	Letter, SAF/MRBR, 5 Sep 03.