RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2004-00753
		INDEX CODE:  110.00, 100.03

		COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  YES

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2C be changed to allow eligibility to reenlist.
_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Due to problems in her marriage at the time, she was informed that, if she went to Mental Health and stated the military was not made for her, she would separate with an honorable discharge.  She was unaware that personality disorder would be listed on her DD Form 214.  She is now divorced and has been working on reenlisting since January 2003.  She has cleared her physical and also passed a psychological consultation with flying colors.  She has not seen or been treated by any mental health facility since her discharge.

In support of her request, applicant submits a personal statement and additional documents associated with the issues cited in her contentions.  The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant contracted her enlistment in the Regular Air Force on 7 May 1997 for a period of six years.  She was been progressively promoted to the grade of senior airman, with an effective date and date of rank of 21 April 1999.

On 10 May 2000, the applicant received notification that she was being recommended for discharge due to having a mental condition that interfered with military service.  The reason for this action was a 9 February 2000 Mental Health Evaluation, with the diagnosis of DSM IV, Axis I - Depressive Disorder Not Otherwise Specified and Axis II - Significant Histrionic Personality Traits.  The applicant acknowledged receipt of the notification.  She consulted military legal counsel and declined to submit any written statements in her behalf.  The base legal office reviewed the case and found it legally sufficient to support separation.  The discharge authority approved the recommended separation and directed that the applicant be issued an honorable discharge, without probation and rehabilitation.

She was honorably discharged on 5 July 2000 under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 (personality disorder).  She had completed a total of 3 years, 1 month and 28 days and was serving in the grade of senior airman (E-4) at the time of discharge.  She received an RE Code of 2C, which defined means "Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge."
_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The BCMR Medical Consultant summarized the information contained in the applicant’s personnel and medical records and is of the opinion that no change in the applicant’s record is warranted.  The Medical Consultant states a normal mental health examination at this time does not change the facts of her history of inability to cope with the stresses of her personal life and military duties, and does not predict that she will respond well to the stresses of military operations, deployment or combat when she is separated from her familiar surroundings and usual support system of family and friends.  Her past experience is predictive of an increased risk for recurrence of symptoms that would similarly interfere with her military duties if re-exposed to the rigors of military training.  Action and disposition in this case are proper and equitable reflecting compliance with Air Force directives that implement the law.  Details of his evaluation are at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 6 January 2005 for review and response.  As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).
_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case.  However, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the AFBCMR Medical Consultant and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has failed to sustain her burden that she has suffered either an error or an injustice.  In this respect, we note the applicant’s mental disorder rendered her unsuitable for continued military service.  Although the applicant is doing well now, it does not exclude the possibility of a recurrence of symptoms that would similarly interfere with her military duties if she is returned to the rigors of a military environment.  The RE code which was issued at the time of applicant’s discharge accurately reflects the circumstances of her separation and we do not find this code to be in error or unjust.  In view of the above and absent persuasive evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

4.  The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will materially add to our understanding of the issue(s) involved.  Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.
_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2004-00753 in Executive Session on 1 March 2005, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

The following documentary evidence was considered:

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 3 Mar 04, w/atchs.
   Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 5 Jan 05.
   Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Jan 05.