RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2004-01472
		INDEX NUMBER:  136.00

		COUNSEL:  NONE

	XXXXXXX	HEARING DESIRED: NO

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be given the required years of service to qualify for benefits under the Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC) program.

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He did not serve 20 years because of the plane crash, which resulted in his disability and the reason he was not able to continue in the Air Force.

In support of his appeal, applicant submitted a copy of WAGO Form 199, the Proceedings of Army Retiring Board of Officers.

Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.

___________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant was permanently retired for disability effective 30 Sep 1947, with a disability rating of 40%.  He completed 6 years of active federal military service.

___________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPD recommends denial of applicant’s request stating, in part, although his service-connected disabilities exceed the required 10 percent rating, the applicant does not meet the basic CRSC eligibility criteria of having 20 years of active service.

The Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC) program, established by Public Law (PL) 107-314, provides compensation to certain retirees with combat-related disabilities.  A retired member of the Uniformed Services must meet each of the four following conditions to meet the preliminary CRSC criteria:

	a.  Has 20 or more years of active service in the Uniformed Services for the purpose of computing the amount of retired pay, or is entitled to retired pay under section 12731 of Title 10, United States Code, unless such retirement is under section 12731b of that same title.

	b.  Is in retired status.

	c.  Is entitled to retired pay, notwithstanding that such retired pay may be reduced due to receipt of Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) disability compensation.

	d.  Has qualifying disability ratings (percentages) [retiree must be entitled to compensation for service-connected disabilities under 10 USC 38 by the DVA].

		Qualifying Combat-Related Disability:  Member has combat-related disabilities (which includes any Purple Heart disabilities) that are compensated by the DVA.

The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 1 Jul 04 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).

___________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We noted the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

___________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

___________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2004-01472 in Executive Session on 15 September 2004, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 3 May 04, w/atchs. 
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPD, dated 24 Jun 04.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Jul 04.