SECOND ADDENDUM TO
                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2004-01785-3
		INDEX NUMBER:  111.02

		COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NO

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

In her request for reconsideration, applicant requests that the Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) rendered for the period 23 Oct 97 through 12 May 00, reflecting a promotion recommendation of “4” be upgraded to a promotion recommendation of “5.”

___________________________________________________________________

RESUME OF CASE:

On 1 Sep 04, the Board considered and denied the applicant’s request that the EPR rendered for the period 23 Oct 97 through    12 May 00, reflecting an overall promotion recommendation of “4” be removed from her records and a reaccomplished report reflecting an overall promotion recommendation of “5” be substituted in its place.  The Board further noted if the applicant believed her subsequent report closing 12 May 01, was in error or unjust and requested its removal from her records, they would be willing to entertain such a request.  For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the application, and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit F.

On 22 Nov 04, the Board considered and granted the applicant’s request to have her EPR closing 12 May 01, voided and removed from her records; and that she be provided supplemental consideration for promotion to the grade of staff sergeant for all appropriate cycles beginning with cycle 02E5.  For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the application, and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Addendum Record of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit H.

In a letter dated 6 Jan 06, the applicant requests reconsideration of the Board’s earlier decision denying upgrade of her EPR closing 12 May 00 to an overall rating of “5.”  She gages her request on failure of her rating chain to conduct performance feedback in accordance with AFI 36-2406 (Exhibit I).

___________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

After careful consideration of the evidence of record and the applicant’s most recent submission, we still find insufficient evidence has been provided that would indicate her 2000 EPR was either erroneous or unjust.  The applicant has again failed to present any facts or circumstances supporting an injustice that would warrant upgrading her 2000 EPR.  Based on the foregoing, and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis upon which to favorably consider her request.

___________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

___________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC‑2004-01785 in Executive Session on 27 February 2006, under the provisions of AFI 36‑2603:

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit H.  Addendum Record of Proceedings, dated 30 Mar 05, 
                W/exhibits A through G.
    Exhibit I.  Applicant's Letter, dated 6 Jan 06, w/atchs.