RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2004-02091
		INDEX NUMBER:  100.06

		COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NO

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 2X be changed to allow him to reenter the military.

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was not under administrative action at the time of his separation.  He would like to join the guard or reserve; or possibly go into another branch of service.  

In support of his application he submits a copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.

___________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 23 Jan 01, for a period of four years in the grade of airman.  His highest grade held was airman first class.

Applicant’s Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) profile follows:

     PERIOD ENDING            OVERALL PROMOTION EVALUATION

     22 Sep 02                             2 (Referral)
     22 Sep 03                             4

AF Form 418 (Selective Reenlistment Program Consideration), dated 22 Dec 03, reflects the applicant’s supervisor did not recommend him for reenlistment, stating the member had shown a continual disregard for Air Force regulations and core values.  He also stated the applicant behaved and performed at a level that was below or just met Air Force standards and given his history of infractions and his attitude, he did not feel the member would ever have the desire or want to improve in any aspect of his personal life or military career.  The applicant’s unit commander concurred with the supervisor and did not select the applicant for reenlistment.  He stated the applicant lacked the effort and desire to try to improve.  The applicant did not appeal the decision.

On 24 Jun 04, the applicant was honorably discharged under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 (Completion of Required Active Service), and furnished an RE code of 2X (First-term, second term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)).  The applicant was credited with 3 years, 5 months, and 2 days of active military service.

___________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ AFPC/DPPAE recommends the application be denied and states, in part, after a review of his military personnel record, they found nothing to support the course of action requested by the applicant.

A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit C.

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 27 Aug 04, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days.  As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).

___________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice that would warrant a change to the applicant’s RE code.  We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we find no evidence, which would show the RE code assigned was in error and after a thorough review of the evidence of record, we do not believe he has been the victim of an injustice.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.  

___________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

___________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC‑2004-02091 in Executive Session on 5 October 2004, under the provisions of AFI 36‑2603:

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 24 Jun 04, w/atch.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 18 Aug 04.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 Aug 04.