ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:			DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2005-01112
		INDEX CODE: 110.00
			COUNSEL:  NONE
			  		HEARING DESIRED:  NO
	

______________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His uncharacterized discharge be changed to honorable.

________________________________________________________________

RESUME OF CASE:

On 17 November 2004, the Board considered and denied a request 
by the applicant to change his Reenlistment Eligibiity (RE) code 
from 2C “Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or 
entry level separation without characterization of service,” to 
one that would have allowed him to reenter into the US military.  
For an accounting of the facts surrounding his previous request 
and the rationale of the Board’s earlier decision, see the 
Record of Proceedings at Exhibit G.

On 26 May 2005, the Board considered and denied an appeal for 
his uncharacterized discharge to be upgraded to an honorable 
discharge.  For an accounting of the facts surrounding his 
previous request and the rationale of the Board's earlier 
decision, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit H.

On 5 April 2009, the applicant requested reconsideration of his 
appeal to have his uncharacterized discharge upgraded to an 
honorable discharge contending he did nothing to disgrace the 
military and he should be allowed to receive an honorable 
discharge.

In support of his appeal for reconsideration, applicant 
provides a copy of page two of the Department of Veterans 
Affairs (DVA) rating decision.

His complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit I.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

In earlier findings, the Board determined there was 
insufficient evidence to warrant any corrective action.  After 
thoroughly reviewing the additional documentation submitted in 
support of his appeal and the evidence of record, we do not 
believe the applicant has overcome the rationale expressed in 
our previous decision.  Therefore, in view of the above, and in 
the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis upon 
which to recommend favorable consideration of the applicant’s 
request.

________________________________________________________________
_

RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; that the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that 
the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board reconsidered BC-2005-01112 in 
Executive Session on 13 August 2009, under the provisions of AFI 
36-2603:

		XXXXXXXXXXXXX, Panel Chair
		XXXXXXXXXXXXX, Member
		XXXXXXXXXXXXX, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit H.  Record of Proceedings, dated 7 June 2005, w/Exhibits.
Exhibit I.  DD Form 149, dated 5 April 2009, w/atch.




						XXXXXXXXXXXXX
						Panel Chair