SECOND ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00608-8

	COUNSEL: NONE

	HEARING: NO

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

The applicant requests that the Board reconsider her request to change her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, dated  14 May 02, to reflect:

1.	Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of MBK, Completion of required active service, rather than JFM, Disability Existed Prior to Service, PEB.
2.	Reenlistment (RE) code of 1J, Eligible to reenlist, but elects separation (Airmen selected under the SRP and elect separation are given RE code 1J) rather than 2Q, Personnel medically retired or discharged.
3.	Narrative Reason for Separation of Failure to certify a Family Care Plan rather than Disability Existed Prior to Service, PEB.
RESUME OF THE CASE:

On 22 Jun 06, the Board considered and denied the applicant’s request to change her RE code and Narrative Reason for Separation, finding that the applicant had provided insufficient evidence of an error or injustice to justify relief.  For an accounting of the applicant’s original request and the rationale of the earlier decision, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit F with Exhibits A - E.

On 27 Nov 06, the applicant was notified her recent request for reconsideration was denied due to it not meeting the criteria for reconsideration.  (Exhibit G). 

On 25 Mar 07, the applicant submitted a request for reconsideration to have her narrative reason for separation and RE code be changed to allow her to reenter military service.  On 2 May 07, the Board denied her request as it did not meet the criteria for reconsideration (Exhibit H).

On 1 May 08, the applicant requested reconsideration via her Congressional representative.  On 30 Jul 08, the Board considered and denied the applicant’s request noting the evidence provided was insufficient to override the Board’s previous decision. For an accounting of the applicant’s request and the rationale of the decision, see the Addendum to the Record of Proceedings (Exhibit I).

By letter dated 11 Aug 09, the applicant again requested reconsideration.  On 29 Sep 09, the Board staff notified the applicant her recent and previously submitted requests did not meet the criteria for reconsideration (Exhibit J).  

By application dated 2 Nov 15, the applicant again requested reconsideration.  On 25 Aug 16, the Board staff notified the applicant his request did not meet the criteria for reconsideration.  The applicant was further advised that absent judicial action the decisions by the Board are final; and that she has the option to seek relief through the courts (Exhibit K).

On 20 Jun 18, the applicant requested reconsideration of her request to change her Narrative Reason for Separation, RE and SPD codes.  She again contends that she does not have a disability; she was recalled to active duty under Operation Stop Loss.  She was unable to deploy because her dog tags were incorrect and she did not have a Family Care Plan in place.  She was unable to trust her family to take care of her children while was deployed because of the sexual assault she experienced as a child by various family members.  The psychiatrists used her statements against her.  She believed her telephones lines were tapped and she was being followed based on her father being investigate for murder.  Also, she asserts the memorandum from AFPC/JA, dated 1 May 06, contains inaccurate information.

The applicant provided a letter from her medical provider stating the applicant is under his care for physical needs and sees a psychiatrist for her psychiatric needs.  The letter further indicates she is physically able to return to the work force, and her psychiatrist should address her psychiatric needs.  

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit L.

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

After reviewing all Exhibits, the Board remains unconvinced the evidence presented demonstrates an error or injustice and therefore finds no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.    Therefore, the Board recommends against correcting the applicant’s records.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The applicant be informed the evidence did not demonstrate material error or injustice, and the application will only be reconsidered upon receipt of relevant evidence not already considered by the Board.

CERTIFICATION:

The following quorum of the Board, as defined in Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-2603, Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR), paragraph 1.5, considered Docket Number BC-2006-00608-8 in Executive Session on 27 Sep 18:

All members voted not to correct the record.  The panel considered the following:

Exhibit F:	Record of Proceedings, w/ Exhibits A-E, dated 4 Aug 06.
Exhibit G:	Letter to Applicant, SAF/MRBC, dated 27 Nov 06.
Exhibit H:	Letter to Applicant, SAF/MRBC, dated 2 May 07.
Exhibit I:	Addendum Record of Proceedings, w/Exhibits F-I, dated 26 Aug 08.
Exhibit J:	Letter to Applicant, SAF/MRBC, dated 29 Sep 09.
Exhibit K:	Letter to Applicant, SAF/MRBC, 25 Aug 16. 
Exhibit L:	DD Form 149, w/atchs, dated 20 Jun 18.

Taken together with all Exhibits, this document constitutes the true and complete Record of Proceedings required by AFI 36-2603, paragraph 4.11.9.