RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2007-02008
		INDEX CODE:  131.00

	XXXXXXX	COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  YES

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  29 DEC 2007

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

The test scores from cycle 07E7 be removed from his records and that he be allowed to retest.

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He believes the results are unjust because the environmental conditions interfered with his concentration.  The classroom atmosphere was so hot, heat could be felt in the adjoining hall way, when the door was opened during the break from the Promotion Fitness Examination (PFE) portion to the Specialty Knowledge Test (SKT) portion, the classroom was emptied.  During the test, his answer sheet was riddled with spots from perspiration.  The environmental conditions were bad enough for him to request, the next day, to install some sort of ventilation device to improve the conditions.

Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.

___________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant tested for cycle 07E7 on 5 Feb 07.  He received an SKT score of 49.00 and PFE score of 47.95.  His overall score was 289.95 and the score required for promotion in his Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) was 301.26.  This was the applicant’s first time competing for promotion to Master Sergeant (MSgt).

___________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ AFPC/DPPPWB reviewed this application and recommended denial.  They state if the applicant felt the environmental condition of the classroom was too uncomfortable, he had the opportunity to voice his concerns to the Test Examiner (TE) at the time of testing.  AFI 36-2605, para 1.19.2., states “…All examinees must inform the TE of any mental or physical condition that may prevent them from doing their best or finishing testing.”  Paragraph 3.3.2. further instructs the TE to eliminate distracting influences in the surrounding environment.  To the extent possible, confirm all examinees are comfortable and not fatigued, ill, or distressed.  If the examinee is affected by one of these conditions, excuse him/her and reschedule testing for a more appropriate time.  It is ultimately the examinees responsibility to ensure she/he is fit to test, either mentally or physically.

HQ AFPC/DPPPWB’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 13 Jul 07 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).

___________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

4.  The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will materially add to our understanding of the issue involved.  Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.

___________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

___________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2007-02008 in Executive Session on 11 September 2007, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 18 Jun 07, w/atchs. 
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPPWB, dated 2 Jul 07.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 Jul 07.