RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2007-03996
		INDEX CODE:  112.00
		COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His reentry code of “4C” - Failed Medical/Physical Procurement Standards, be changed to a code that would allow him to reenlist.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He desires to reenlist.  He has a medical waiver proving he does not have asthma.

In support of his request, the applicant provided a copy of a Waiver and Determination Report and documentation extracted from his military personnel records.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

According to documentation provided by the applicant, he enlisted in the Untied Stated Marine Corps on 13 February 2006 and was discharged on 11 April 2006 for a "condition, not a disability."

On 1 February 2007, he enlisted in the Air Force Reserve (AFRes) and entered active duty on 30 July 2007.  On 27 August 2007, he was separated from the Air Force for "failing medical/physical procurement standards."

He received a reentry code of 4C.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFRC/A1E recommends denial.  A1E states the applicant’s reentry code reflects he "failed medical/physical procurement standards” for entry into the armed forces, specifically the Air Force or AFRes.  However, this reentry does not preclude the applicant from reentering the Air Force or AFRes, if in fact he meets the entry requirements at the time of his application, i.e., the applicant must meet all the physical, mental, aptitude requirements, etc required for enlistment into the Air Force or AFRes at the time of application.  Thus, per consultation with AFRC/RS, it is suggested that if the applicant still has an interest in the armed forces of the United States, and he feels that he meets the applicable standards for entry; he should contact the armed service recruiter of his choice and make application for their determination of his ability to serve.

AFRC/A1E’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 8 February 2008, the evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C).  As of this date, this office has received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.	The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.	The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice.  After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s submission, it is our opinion that given the circumstances surrounding his separation from the Air Force, the reentry code assigned was proper and in compliance with the appropriate directives.  The applicant has not provided any evidence which shows he has been barred from entering any branch of service based upon the 4C reentry code.  Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2007-03996 in Executive Session on 18 March 2008, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

The following documentary evidence was considered:

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 21 November 2007, w/atchs.
   Exhibit B.  Letter, AFRC/A1E, dated 31 January 2008.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 February 2008.