RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:	BC-2008-01655 INDEX CODE:	100.00

COUNSEL:	NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His records be corrected to show his Inactive Reserve obligation as January 2012.

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He served for four years on active duty and now has a remaining four-year Inactive Reserve obligation.

The applicant has not provided any evidence in support of his appeal.

Applicant’s complete submission is attached.

STATEMENT OF FACTS:
A query of the Military Personnel Data System (MilPDS) reveals the applicant began his military career on 20 January 2004. He was progressively promoted to the grade of airman first class (A1C) effective and with a date of rank (DOR) of 3 August 2007. After serving his first term, he was not offered reenlistment as he had not reached the minimum grade required (senior airman/E- 4).  Therefore, he was honorably discharged on 19 January 2008.

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The AFPC/DPSOS received this application for an advisory opinion on 8 May 2008. To date, no advisory has been received by this office.

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1.	The applicant has not exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.	The application was timely filed.
3.	Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we find that he has not shown that he has exhausted all administrative remedies to find the relief he seeks prior to applying to the AFBCMR. Further, he has not provided evidence to show his military service obligation of eight years is, in fact, incorrectly reflected in his records. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2008-01655 in Executive Session on 29 July 2009, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

Panel Chair 
Member 
Member

The following documentary evidence was considered: Attachment:	DD Form 149, dated 15 Apr 08.

2