RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-03369 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: XXXXXXXXX COUNTY VETERANS SERVICE OFFICE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 20 Jan 04 disability discharge with severance pay be rescinded and he be allowed to transfer to the Inactive Status List Reserve Section (ISLRS), awaiting retired pay at age 60. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was not fully informed of the requirement for Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) disability compensation to be offset by the severance pay he received in conjunction with his disability discharge from the Air Force. Had he been fully informed, he would not have elected to receive the severance pay, but instead would have elected to be transferred to ISLRS until he became eligible to receive retired pay at age 60. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant was honorably discharged from the Air Force Reserve on 20 Jan 04 under the provisions of AFI 36-3209 (Disability – Entitled to Severance Pay). He was credited with 12 years, 5 months, and 9 days of total active service, and 10 years, 4 months, and 15 days of total inactive (Reserve) service. On 22 Sep 05, the applicant’s request to have his records corrected to reflect his name was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL), rather than being discharged with severance pay, was considered and denied by the Board (Exhibit C). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force which is attached at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSD recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice during the disability process or at the time of the applicant’s discharge. The member elected to receive severance pay, forfeiting all rights to receive retired pay at age 60 under Chapter 1223, 10 USC. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSD evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 10 Jul 09 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit E). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice warranting rescission of the applicant’s discharge with severance pay in favor of his transfer to the Inactive Status List Reserve Section (ISLRS) to await retired pay at age 60. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence the applicant was given erroneous or incomplete information regarding his options related to his fitness determination and subsequent disability separation, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2008-03369 in Executive Session on 5 Jan 10, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: XXXXXXXXXX, Panel Chair XXXXXXXXXX, Panel Member XXXXXXXXXX, Panel Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 4 Aug 08. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Record of Proceedings, dated 22 Sep 05. Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSD, dated 22 Jun 09. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Jul 09.