RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-03966 INDEX CODE: 112.10 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation, “Psychoneurosis result from combat” be changed on his DD Form 214 to "Bacterial Dysentery". ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His military health record is completely different from the diagnosis of his surgeon at Long Beach Army Air Field, Long Beach, CA hospital. He was physically ill and in a much weakened condition; thus the surgeon's reaction to give him a 100 percent disability due to the effects of bacteria dysentery and malaria. In support of his application, applicant provides a personal statement, letters from his sister and friend, letters to and from his congressman, a letter from his doctor, a copy of WD AGO Form 53-55, Enlisted Record and Report of Separation Honorable Discharge, WD AGO Form 80, Certificate of Disability for Discharge, a copy of VA Form 21-4138, Statement in Support of Claim, a copy of VA Form 21-526, Veteran's Application for Compensation or Pension, and medical research articles. Applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant enlisted in the Army Air Corps on 19 June 1943 as a private and was progressively promoted to the grade of private first class. On 28 September 1945, a Board of Medical Officers concluded the applicant was unfit for military service because of psychoneurosis resulting from combat. On 19 October 1945, the applicant was medically discharged, with a narrative reason of Psychoneurosis, after serving 2 years, 4 months, and 14 days. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial and states the applicant indicates that he suffered instead from Bacterial Dysentery during his military service, which resulted in his Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) instead of Psychoneurosis. He has presented evidence that reflects IBS may indeed follow as a consequence of Bacterial Dysentery. He therefore contends his IBS should be service-connected. However, other than the applicant's statements that a surgeon told him he had Bacterial Dysentery and reportedly recommended a "100 percent disability" and the letter submitted by his sister, there is insufficient objective evidence of record upon which to validate his claim. This comment is not meant to question the integrity of the letter, or its author, submitted on the applicant's behalf. Additionally, the BCMR Medical Consultant found no evidence or basis upon which to validate the applicant's allegation the "military deliberately fabricated" the basis for his discharge, as reflected on his Certificate of Disability for Discharge. In conclusion, the BCMR Medical Consultant opines the applicant has not met the burden of proof that justifies a change in the narrative reason for discharge to Bacterial Dysentery. The complete BCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states he is very disappointed to know that the Board ignored the facts in his case and rendered arbitrary advisory opinions based upon "our facts" only, which were fabricated by the military or someone else. Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit F. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded his records should be changed. In this regard, we note the disability discharge appears to be in compliance with the governing regulations in effect at the time and we find no evidence to indicate the applicant’s separation from the Army Air Corps was inappropriate. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the BCMR Medical Consultant and adopt his rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or an injustice. In the absence of persuasive evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2008-03966 in Executive Session on 14 May 2009, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 5 Sep 08, w/atch. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 27 Feb 09. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Mar 09. Exhibit E. Applicant's Response, dated 2 Apr 09.