RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00123 INDEX CODE: 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge be corrected to reflect: 1. Award of the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM). 2. Credit for service in Vietnam. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Due to an administrative error, his service in Vietnam and the AFCM were not reflected on his DD Form 214. In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214 and citation for the AFCM. The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 16 Aug 67, the applicant contracted his enlistment in the Regular Air Force. He was progressively promoted to the grade of sergeant, having assumed the grade effective and with a date of rank of 1 Jul 69. He was honorably discharged on 3 Jun 71. He served three years, seven months and eight days of active service. On 11 May 10, AFPC/DPAPP informed the applicant that they confirmed and verified his boots on ground foreign service in Cam Ranh Bay AB, Vietnam, and that the foreign service on his DD Form 214 is correct. On 7 Jun 10, AFPC/DPSIDRA informed the applicant that his eligibility and entitlement to the Vietnam Service Medal with two Bronze Service Stars, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm, and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign was verified and his records would be administratively corrected to reflect the medals. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the AFCM. AFPC/DPSIDR states the AFCM is awarded to service members who, while serving in any capacity with the Air Force after 24 Mar 58, shall have distinguished themselves by meritorious achievement or service. The degree of merit must be distinctive, but is not required to involve the voluntary risk of life required for the Soldier’s Medal (or the Airman’s Medal now authorized for the Air Force), be considered for the AFCM. According to AFPC/DPSIDR, there is no special order or certificate provided by the applicant or located within his official military records that would support he was recommended for or awarded the AFCM. The complete AFPC/DPSIDRA evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 25 Jun 10, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took note of the documentation provided in support of the applicant’s request for award of the AFCM; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our decision that the applicant has failed to sustain his burden of proof of the existence of an error or injustice. In regard to his service credit in Vietnam, AFPC/DPAPP confirmed and verified his foreign service and informed him that his DD Form 214 accurately reflects his foreign service. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-00123 in Executive Session on 1 Sep 10, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 6 Jan 10, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSIDRA, dated 9 Jun 10. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 25 Jun 10. Panel Chair _________________________________________________________________