RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00784 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 4I which denotes “Serving on the Control Roster” be changed to RE code 3K. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He did not complete an ancillary training quiz on time; however, it does not merit a Letter of Counseling. One Letter of Reprimand does not merit remaining on the control roster. In support of his request, the applicant provides a personal letter and copies of his AF IMT 74, Record of Individual Counseling and Letter of Reprimand. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 3 August 2004. On 15 January 2006, the applicant received a referral Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) which stated his conduct was substandard, that he was continuously late, failed to obey orders and his appearance was below standards. On 17 January 2007, the applicant received another referral EPR, which states that he received two Letters of Reprimand (LOR), was placed on the Control Roster twice due to repeated unacceptable conduct, had two failures-to-go, failure to obey orders and failure to meet financial responsibilities. On 15 March 2007, the applicant was released from active duty under the Fiscal Year 2007 (FY07) Force Shaping Program. He was furnished an honorable discharge certificate, with a narrative reason of completion of required active service and assigned an RE code of 4I. He was credited with 2 years, 7 months, and 13 days of active service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibit C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSI recommends denial. DPSI states both the LOC and LOR were processed under the provisions of AFI 36-2903, Unfavorable Information File (UIF). Commanders, supervisors, and other persons in authority can issue administrative counseling, admonitions, and reprimands. These actions are intended to improve, correct, and instruct subordinates. The applicant was given three duty days upon receipt to submit rebuttal documents for consideration by the initiator; however, he declined to make written comments. The complete DPSI evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. DPSOA states the RE code of 4I is the appropriate code based on his actions. There is no evidence of error or injustice in his records and the applicant did not submit any evidence to support a change. The applicant was ineligible to reenlist because he was on the control roster and separated under the FY07 Force Shaping Program. The complete DPSOA evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 11 June 2010, for review and response within 30 days. As of this date, this office has received no response (Exhibit E). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice warranting changes to the applicant’s RE code. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence the RE code of 4I was erroneously assigned or inaccurately reflected the circumstances of his separation, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. In view of the above, and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we conclude that no basis exist to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-00784 in Executive Session on 7 October 2010, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 19 Feb 10, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSI, dated 6 Apr 10. Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 11 May 10. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 11 Jun 10.