RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01566 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His debt in the amount of $2826.17 be forgiven. ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His discharge from the Missouri Air National Guard (MOANG) was in the best interest of the Air Force based on his active duty military spouse’s permanent change of station (PCS) orders to the United Kingdom. In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a letter of support from his commander to the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS), dated 2 Apr 10. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant was discharged on 20 Jul 09. At the time of his discharge, he had fulfilled 37 months of a 72 month contract with an enlistment bonus entitlement of $15000.00. The applicant was paid $10,500.00 which left a debt of $2791.67 to be recouped at separation. In addition, a debt of $34.50 for Servicemembers Group Life Insurance (SGLI) was transferred to his account at separation. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DFAS-IN recommends denial. The applicant voluntarily separated from the MOANG which requires recoupment of the unearned portion of this enlistment bonus. The applicant’s payments were posted on 10 Jan 07, for $7500.00, on 11 Jul 07 and 13 Jul 08 for $1500.00, with total payments of $10,500.00. Adjustment of entitlement due to early release from the ANG requires recoupment of bonus. The complete DFAS-IN evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 16 Jul 10 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Defense Finance and Accounting Service and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-01566 in Executive Session on 10 November 2010, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 14 Apr 10, w/atch. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, DFAS/IN, undated. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 16 Jul 10.