RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02231 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The former member’s records be corrected to reflect his service in Southwest Asia; specifically Vietnam. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: As the widow of the former member, she needs to show her husband served in Vietnam to establish Agent Orange exposure in order to be eligible for VA benefits. She provides her husband’s performance report which states “He worked with Pacific GEEIA Region Engineers on a Radio Frequency Interference Survey in Japan, and has been on numerous TDY trips to Southeast Asia Military Aid Program Countries to provide technical …” In support of her request, the applicant provides a copy of the former member’s performance report and copies of his DD Forms 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge. Her complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in this Record of Proceedings. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial. DPAPP states that although the former member’s performance report indicates he was assigned numerous TDY’s to Southeast Asia, the report fails to mention a location or duration. The information provided by the applicant and in the former member’s master personnel records did not contain information reflecting he served in Vietnam; therefore, DPAPP cannot support this request. The DPAPP complete evaluation is at Exhibit B. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 19 Nov 10 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this office has received no response. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the former member has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-02231 in Executive Session on 1 Feb 11, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence for Docket Number BC-2010-02231 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 27 May 10, w/atchs. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 5 Nov 10. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Nov 10.