RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2010-02755 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect award of: 1. The Air Force Good Conduct Medal (AFGCM). 2. The National Defense Service Medal (NDSM). (Administratively corrected) 3. The Armed Force Expeditionary Medal (AFEM). (Withdrawn) 4. The Air Force Longevity Service Award (AFLSA). (Administratively corrected) _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He believes he meets the criteria for the AFGCM, NDSM, and the AFLSA. In addition, he believes his temporary duty (TDY) from Seymour Johnson Air Force Base (AFB), South Carolina to McCoy AFB, Florida, during the Cuban Missile Crisis qualifies him for entitlement to the AFEM. In support of his appeal, the applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is a former member of the Regular Air Force, who served on active duty from 19 June 1959 to 18 June 1963 for a total of four years. His DD Form 214 reflects he received the Good Conduct Medal (GCM) and that he does not have any Foreign Service. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDRA states they were able to verify his entitlement for award of the NDSM and the AFLSA. In addition, they have notified the applicant that he is entitled to the GCM as annotated on his DD Form 214 and not the AFGCM for his honorable active duty service. In their notification letter to the applicant, DPSIDRA indicates the AFGCM was authorized on 1 June 1963 and is awarded to enlisted service members of the United States (U.S.) Air Force for exemplary conduct during a three-year period of service while in the active military service of the U.S. For qualifying service prior to the establishment of the AFGCM, the GCM was issued. The applicant’s DD Form 214 accurately reflects his entitlement to the GCM as his qualifying period of service was before the AFGCM was authorized. DPSIDRA recommends denial for award of the AFEM. DPSIDRA indicates the AFEM was awarded for deployed service in direct support of operations in Cuba from 24 October 1962 to 1 June 1963. After a thorough review of the applicant’s official military record, they were unable to verify he deployed to any overseas location for which the AFEM was awarded. The applicant’s entire active duty service was completed within the Continental U.S.; therefore, he is ineligible for entitlement to the AFEM. The complete DPSIDRA evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He withdraws his request for entitlement to the AFEM. After a more thorough review of DoD 1348.33M, he sees that his service did not meet the criteria. Although he was deployed to the forward support area for combat operations of the 4th Tactical Fighter Wing for the duration of the Cuban Missile Crisis, it was in Florida and not on foreign territory. He apologizes for taking the Board’s time unnecessarily in this issue. The applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice in regard to the applicant’s request for award of the AFGCM. Based on the applicant’s withdrawal of his request for the AFEM and the Air Force office of primary responsibility’s administrative correction of his record to reflect the NDSM and AFLSA, the AFGCM is the only request considered by this Board. In that regard, we took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of this request; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting any relief beyond that granted administratively. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-02755 in Executive Session on 19 April 2011, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence was considered in connection with AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-02755: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 19 Jul 10, w/atch. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIDRA, dated 9 Sep 10. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 Sep 10. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 30 Sep 10.