RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04216 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The characterization of his discharge be upgraded to honorable, or in the alternative, to general (under honorable conditions) due to medical reasons. 2. His former rank of staff sergeant (E-5) be reinstated. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: A medical discharge from the Air Force is justified since the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) granted his service- connection for a disability incurred in 1982 at RAF Lakenheath, England. In support of his application, the applicant provides copies of the DD Forms 214 issued for his periods of active service and a DVA rating decision dated 20 August 2010. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is a former member of the Regular Air Force who entered active duty on 4 June 1976 and was released from active duty and transferred to the Air Force Reserve (AFRes) on 3 June 1980 at the expiration of his term of service. He subsequently reenlisted in the Reg AF and served on active duty from 19 January 1981 until 2 December 1982, at which time he was discharged under the authority of AFM 39-12 (Unsuitability- Apathy, Defective Attitude), with service characterized as general (under honorable conditions). On 6 February 1997, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicant’s request for an upgrade of his discharge characterization. A complete AFDRB hearing record is at Exhibit C. On 15 April 2010, the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) awarded the applicant a 100 percent service-connected disability rating for anxiety disorder not otherwise specified (NOS), depressive disorder NOS, somatoform disorder NOS, and personality disorder NOS (previously addressed as dysthymic disorder, stress, and dysphoria disorder. ________________________________________________________________ FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE BOARD: We have carefully reviewed the applicant’s submission and the evidence of record and do not find a sufficient basis to excuse the untimely filing of this application. The applicant did not file within three years after the alleged error or injustice was discovered as required by Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552 and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records. The applicant has not shown a plausible reason for the delay in filing, and we are not persuaded that the record raises issues of error or injustice which require resolution on the merits. Thus, we cannot conclude it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the untimely filing of this application. ________________________________________________________________ DECISION OF THE BOARD: The application was not timely filed and it would not be in the interest of justice to waive the untimeliness. It is the decision of the Board, therefore, to reject the application as untimely. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-04216 in Executive Session on 1 September 2011, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 6 Nov 2010, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. AFDRB Hearing Record, dated 14 Feb 97. Exhibit D. Letter, Applicant, dated 2 June 11, w/atchs. Exhibit E. Letter, Kentucky American Legion, not dtd.