RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00047 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His reentry code (RE) 2C (involuntary separation with an 
honorable discharge; or entry level separation without 
characterization of service) be changed to allow him entry into 
the Air National Guard. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He was discharged unjustly. He signed a six year contract and 
would like to reenlist. 

 

The applicant submits no supporting documentation. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

On 20 July 2010, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air 
Force. 

 

On 21 October 2010, the squadron commander initiated 
administrative discharge action against the applicant for his 
reluctance to make the effort necessary to meet Air Force 
standards of conduct and duty performance. Specifically, the 
applicant self eliminated from the Aircrew Fundamentals Course. 

 

On 27 October 2010, the applicant was discharged under the 
provisions of AFPD 36-32 Military Separations and Retirements 
and AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen, with an 
entry level performance or conduct separation and his service 
was uncharacterized. He was credited with serving 3 months and 
13 days. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 


AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. DPSOA states RE code 2C is 
required per AFI 36-2606, Reenlistments in the USAF, based on 
his entry level separation and uncharacterized service. 

 

The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial. DPSOS states the applicant’s 
discharge to include his characterization were appropriately 
administered and within the discretion of the discharge 
authority. Additionally, the applicant submits no evidence 
warranting a change to his reentry code. 

 

The complete DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit D. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the 
applicant on 11 June 2011, for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit E). As of this date, this office has received no 
response. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinions and 
recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary 
responsibility, and adopt their rationale as the basis for our 
conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an 
error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to 
the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief 
sought in this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 


submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC- 
2011-00047 in Executive Session on 7 July 2011 under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 27 Dec 10. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 21 Apr 11. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOS, dated 20 Mar 11. 

 Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 May 11. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair