RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02082 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be credited with four inactive duty training (IDT) points for duty he performed in Feb 10. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He performed his monthly drill weekend in a temporary duty (TDY) status, but his statement of service does not reflect he was appropriately credited for this service. In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of documents extracted from the Virtual Military Personnel Flight (vMPF) related to his point credit summary, a leave and earnings statement (LES), a TDY order and travel voucher, and email correspondence related to the matter under review. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Information extracted from the Military Personnel Data System (MilPDS) indicates the applicant currently serves in the Air Force Reserve in the grade of staff sergeant (E-5). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPT recommends denial, indicating the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence of an error or injustice. The applicant claims he completed IDT at Holloman AFB, NM on 6 and 7 Feb 10, one month before he was gained to his new unit. Despite providing documentation of his intent to participate in a unit training assembly (UTA) with his new unit, he failed to provide proof of participation. He did however provide a military LES that does not reflect IDT performance, uncertified travel orders and an incomplete travel voucher to support his claim. While the email correspondence provided indicates that he traveled to Holloman AFB on 5 Feb 10, he has provided no evidence that he completed the IDT. On 8 Aug 11, the applicant was asked to provide proof that he performed the IDT he is claiming and, as of 22 Nov 11, he has not responded. Such proof would have included AF Forms 40A, Unit Training Assembly Processing System (UTAPS) documentation, or proof of pay. Moreover, a review of the Reserve Component Pay System revealed no change to the applicant’s pay record for 5 through 7 Feb 10. A complete copy of the ARPC/DPT evaluation is at Exhibit B. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 16 Dec 11 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been adequately rebutted by the applicant. Absent persuasive evidence the applicant was denied rights to which he was entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed, or appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to disturb the existing record. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-02082 in Executive Session on 19 Jan 12, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 13 May 11, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, ARPC/DPT, dated 5 Dec 11, w/atch. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 16 Dec 11.