RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02398 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge be corrected to reflect he contributed to the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He contributed to the MGIB. At the time of his discharge he was bullied into marking that he did not contribute even though he did, he was young and did not know any better. In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 2366, Montgomery BI Bill Act of 1984. The applicant's complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 8 Feb 93, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force. On 6 Aug 96, he was discharged with an under honorable conditions (general) discharge. He served 3 years, 5 months and 29 days of total active service. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial. DPSIT states a member’s MGIB is not annotated on the DD Form 214. The only annotation on a DD Form 214 is for the contributions to the Post-Vietnam ERA Veteran’s Educational Assistance Program (VEAP), Chapter 34 which the applicant was not eligible for. The applicant is confusing two different GI Bill programs. He signed up for Chapter 30, MGIB on 8 Feb 93, and his pay was reduced by $1200.00. The applicant’s DD Form 214 is correct as he did not contribute to the VEAP program. In addition, his DD Form 214 is annotated with a separation code that makes him ineligible for the MGIB. The complete DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 29 Jul 11 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, this office has not received a response. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After a thorough review of the available evidence and the applicant’s complete submission, we do not find it sufficient to conclude that his records should be corrected to show he contributed to the Montgomery GI Bill. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2011-02398 in Executive Session on 15 Nov 11, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 26 Jun 11. Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPSIT, Letter, dated 13 Jul 11. Exhibit D. SAF/MRBR, Letter, dated 29 Jul 11.