RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02578 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 3A (First-term airman who separates before completing 36 months (60 months for a 6-year enlistee) on current enlistment and who has no known disqualifying factors or ineligibility conditions except grade, skill level, and insufficient Total Active Federal Military Service (TAFMS)) be changed to a “1” series RE code that would allow him to reenlist. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He did not have any disciplinary action throughout his career while in the Air Force. In support of his request, the applicant submits documents extracted from his military personnel records. The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 16 May 2006 for a period of six years. On 18 August 2010, the applicant was honorably released and transferred to the Air Force Reserve. He served 4 years 3 months and 3 days on active duty. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. DPSOA states the applicant does not state there is an error or injustice in reference to his RE code 3A and recognizes the RE code is correct and waivable if recruiting services deems it appropriate to waive. However, he is asking for a 1 series RE code so he can attempt to rejoin the military without a waiver, as he states 1 series codes are the only RE codes being accepted. The applicant’s RE code 3A is correct and required based on his six year enlistment and time in service at the time of separation, per AFI 36-2606; as all six year enlistees who separate prior to completing 60 months of service receive a RE code of 3A (as long as a higher priority negative RE code does not apply). The DPSOA complete evaluation is at Exhibit B. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 26 August 2011, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C). As of this date, this office has received no response. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has failed to sustain his burden of proof of the existence of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-02578 in Executive Session on 12 January 2012, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-02578 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 3 July 2011, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 16 August 2011. Exhibit C. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 26 August 2011.