RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02994 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His reenlistment (RE) code of “2C” (involuntarily separated with 
an honorable discharge, or entry level separation without 
characterization of service) be changed to allow him to reenter 
military service. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

Due to family problems he was unable to focus on his military 
training. He requested to be switched to a reserve unit but was 
not given any sympathy. 

 

The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

On 1 Jun 10, the applicant contracted his enlistment in the 
Regular Air Force. He served as a security forces helper. 

 

On 17 Nov 10, the applicant’s commander notified him that he was 
recommending his discharge from the Air Force for entry level 
performance or conduct. The specific reason for the discharge 
action was the applicant received an Article 15 for failing to 
obey an order or regulation (dereliction in the performance of 
duties) by stating on 20 Sep 10, that he would not train in the 
Security Forces career field. 

 

His commander advised him of his rights in this matter. The 
applicant acknowledged receipt of the notification and waived his 
right to consult with legal counsel and to submit a statement in 
his own behalf. 

 

The legal office reviewed the case and found it legally 
sufficient to support separation and recommended the applicant be 
furnished an entry level separation. 

 

The discharge authority concurred with the commander’s 
recommendation and the applicant was furnished an entry level 


separation with uncharacterized service on 30 Nov 10. He was 
credited with six months of active service. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial noting the applicant has not 
provided any evidence of an error or injustice regarding his RE 
code. Per the governing regulation, AFI 36-2606, Reenlistments 
in the USAF, the applicant received the appropriate RE code based 
him receiving an entry level separation with uncharacterized 
service. 

 

The complete AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

He entered the Air Force to serve his country, honor his family, 
and to excel in a career that he wanted to be a part of more than 
anything. Upon entering technical school he began receiving 
numerous calls regarding the issues, health, and problems of his 
family. Although, he is a strong individual and can handle 
stress, it all began to wear on him. He spoke to his commander 
regarding his situation and his commander referred him to the 
Active/Guard recruiter. He talked with the recruiter about his 
options. He began the paperwork to enlist into the Reserves; but 
was unable to meet the requirement of being separated before 
continuing with enlisting in the Reserves (Exhibit E). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice. We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission, to include his 
rebuttal response, in judging the merits of the case; however, we 
agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office 
of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis 
for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of 
an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to 
the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief 
sought in this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-02994 in Executive Session on 13 Mar 12, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 


 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 27 Jul 12. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Military Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSOA, 20 Sep 11. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 Oct 11. 

 Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, undated.