RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03287 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He is on a self-improvement campaign and wishes to correct or make amends for previously wasting his life away. He is 63 years old and has become a registered voter. He would like to attend college in the fall. If his discharge is upgraded, the state of Florida will issue him a high school diploma and then allow him to attend college. In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, and a copy of a letter from the Florida Department of Education. His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant enlisted into the Regular Air Force on 22 Jun 67. The applicant was notified by his commander that he was recommending him for discharge from the Air Force under the provisions of AFM 39-12, paragraph 2-15a, Section B, Chapter 2, for unfitness. The specific reasons for this action were for wrongfully loitering on post; for wrongfully having possessed a trace of marijuana, for failing to go at the time prescribed to his appointed place of duty, and for being absent without authority. The applicant received a general discharge on 8 May 70, after serving 2 years, 10 months, and 13 days on active duty. Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Clarksburg, West Virginia, was unable to identify an arrest record. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice. After careful consideration of the available evidence, we found no indication the actions taken to effect the applicant’s discharge were improper or contrary to the provisions of the governing regulations in effect at the time, or the actions taken against the applicant were based on factors other than his own misconduct. We considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to recommend granting the relief sought on that basis. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis upon which to recommend granting the relief sought. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-03287 in Executive Session on 20 Oct 11, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence for Docket Number BC-2011- 03287 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 29 Jul 11, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.