RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03469 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be updated to add the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon (SAEMR). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He fired 60 out 60 shots on the M-16 and was informed that he was considered an expert. He was told he earned the SAEMR and wore it while serving on active duty. He did not pay much attention to his DD Form 214 until recently when he noticed the ribbon was not listed on the form. He does not provide any supporting documentation. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force which is located at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR reviewed this application and recommends denial. There is no official documentation to support the applicant’s request to add the SAEMR to his DD Form 214. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 22 Dec 11 for review and response. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, the applicant has not provided any documentary evidence to substantiate his claim that he meets the criteria for the SAEMR. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-03469 in Executive Session on 23 Feb 12, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence for Docket Number BC-2011- 03469 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 1 Sep 11. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 9 Nov 11 Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 22 Dec 11.