RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03749 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be issued the Air Force Overseas Ribbon (AFOR). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The AFOR was never issued or annotated in his personnel records. In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, and copies of special orders. His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant enlisted into the Regular Air Force on 10 Oct 57 and was progressively promoted to the grade of A3G E-2 (P). The applicant’s special orders reflect that he was assigned to the 934th Aircraft Control and Warning Squadron, Latrar, Iceland, reporting not later than 26 Dec 59. AFOR Criteria: The award was created by the Secretary of the Air Force in 1980. Only Air Force personnel serving on active duty as of 6 Jan 86 were eligible to have the AFOR applied retroactively for completed overseas tours (long or short). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit B. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial. The applicant does not meet the eligibility requirements for award of the AFOR because he was discharged 20 years prior to the establishment of the award and was not serving on active duty on or after 6 Jan 86. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit B. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 9 Dec 11 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this office has received no response. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-03749 in Executive Session on 27 Mar 12, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence for Docket Number BC-2011-03749 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated, 20 Sep 11, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 23 Nov 11. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Dec 11.