RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03969 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect his service in Thailand. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was sent on temporary duty (TDY) to Takhli, Thailand in Jul 72. He flew from Clark AFB, Philippines to DaNang, South Vietnam to Takhli, Thailand. In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, and a copy of his separation order. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. _________________ ______________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant’s military personnel records indicate that he enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 13 Jul 71 and served on active duty until his Honorable discharge on 18 Dec 72. He was credited with one year, six months, and five days of active service, with no foreign service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s master personnel records, are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. A review of the applicant’s Master Personnel Records and the documentation he submitted failed to identify any documents that substantiate foreign service in Thailand. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant restates his original claim that he went TDY to Thailand in Jul 72. He provides the names of three other individuals whose names would have been listed on the TDY orders along with his (Exhibit E). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. We note that in response to the Air Force evaluation the applicant provides the names of three other Air Force members who would have been on his orders as well some details pertaining to the itinerary of his purported trip to Southeast Asia to aid in the search for evidence that he served in Thailand. However, the applicant is reminded the Board is not an investigative body and in accordance with the governing statute, the burden of proof of an error or injustice rests with him. Therefore, in view of the above and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis for us to recommend granting relief. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-03969 in Executive Session on 3 May 12, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 9 Aug 11, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPAPP, dated 21 Nov 11. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Dec 11. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 19 Dec 11.