RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04460 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His four days of leave lost at the end of fiscal year (FY) 2011 be restored. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Title 10, USC, Section 701-F-2 grants permission to retain any accumulated leave in excess of 75 days at the end of the FY for supporting a contingency operation for a continuous period of at least 60 days. He was deployed in support of Operation ENDURING FREEDOM (OEF) from Oct through Dec 2011. The applicant did not provide any documentation in support of his request. His complete submission is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in the rank of master sergeant (MSgt, E-7). The applicant carried forward 83 days of leave at the beginning of FY 2011. He earned 30 days of leave during FY 2011 and used 34 days of leave during FY 2011. He lost four days of leave at the end of FY 2011 ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. DPSIM states that AFI 36-3003, Military Leave Program, states in part, “Members not eligible for SLA can request recovery of days lost by application, DD Form 149, Application for Correction of Military Records, under the Provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code Section 1552. Member’s application must clearly establish that an error or injustice by the Air Force caused the member’s lost leave. If the Board restores leave to current leave account, members must use these days before the end of the current FY.” On 29 Nov 2011, DPSIMC requested additional documentation from the applicant to support his claim; specifically orders received from all deployments that prevented him from using the lost four days of leave during FY 2011. The applicant did not provide the requested supporting documentation. The complete DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit B. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 20 Mar 2012, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C). As of this date, this office has not received a response. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 23 Aug 2012, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC- 2011-04460: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 5 Oct 2011. Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 1 Mar 2012. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 Mar 2012.