RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04629 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

The 1.5 mile run time on his fitness assessment, dated 21 October 
2011, be corrected to reflect 11:42 instead of 14:42. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He initiated a retest upon notification of the failure. He 
performed the 1.5 mile run in 11:24, showing the previous test was 
incorrectly annotated. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his 
Air Force Fitness Management score, a copy of his Fitness Program 
Scorecard and the Air Force Fitness Management print-out. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in the 
grade of technical sergeant (E-6). The applicant received an 
unsatisfactory result on his fitness assessment dated 21 October 
2011, by achieving a composite score of 67.11. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. The applicant provided signed 
documentation stating to the best of his knowledge all scores 
reflected his performance. 

 

The complete DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit B. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 


 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 29 December 2011, for review and comment within 
30 days (Exhibit C). As of this date, this office has received 
no response. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an injustice. We took notice of the 
applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of this 
case. However, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of 
the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has 
not been the victim of an error or injustice. In the absence of 
evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend 
granting the relief sought in this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly 
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 
BC-2011-04629 in Executive Session on 17 May 2012 under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 


 

 

 

 

 


 

The following documentary evidence pertaining to BCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-04629 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 7 Nov 11, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 13 Dec 11. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 Dec 11.