RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04867 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code 2X (First-term, second-term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under SRP) be changed to allow him to reenlist. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He believes he should be allowed to reenlist due to his service record. The applicant submits no supporting documentation. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 21 November 2005. He was separated on 31 August 2010. His service was characterized as honorable and his RE code was listed as 2X. He was credited with 4 years, 9 months and 10 days of active duty service. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. The applicant’s commander denied him reenlistment eligibility per the AF Form 418, Selective Reenlistment Program Consideration. The applicant acknowledged his non-selection and declined to appeal the commander’s decision. His non-selection required the RE code of 2X. Commander’s have selective reenlistment selection or non- selection authority. The Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) considers the members Enlistment Performance Report ratings, Unfavorable Information from any substantiated source, the airman’s willingness to comply with Air Force standards and or the airman’s ability or lack of to meet required training and duty performance. The applicant provides no evidence of error or injustice. The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 24 January 2012, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, this office has received no response. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we are not persuaded by the evidence submitted in his appeal that a change in his RE code is warranted. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility, and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-04867 in Executive Session on 7 June 2012 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 30 Nov 11. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 16 Jan 12. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 24 Jan 12.