RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00605 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed from North Dakota to Germany. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: When she entered the military, she listed Grand Forks, North Dakota as her HOR because she lived there with her ex-husband who was stationed at Grand Forks AFB. Her real HOR is where her records reside in Germany. After her retirement, she would like to return to Germany to her immediate family. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: According to the applicant’s military personnel records, she retired from the Regular Air Force in the grade of technical sergeant on 1 Apr 12. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The applicant’s records reflect North Dakota as the state in which she lived on 19 Mar 92 when she entered the Air Force. Grand Forks, ND has been consistently listed throughout her career as her HOR. The Joint Federal Travel Regulation (JFTR) for Uniformed Service Members states the HOR is the place recorded as the home of the individual when commissioned, appointed, enlisted, inducted, or ordered into a tour of active duty. Therefore, the applicant’s HOR is and should remain Grand Forks, North Dakota. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIPE evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 27 Mar 12 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis upon which to recommend favorable action on this application. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-00605 in Executive Session on 6 Sep 12, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-00605 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 31 Jan 12. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIPE, dated 5 Mar 12, w/atch. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 Mar 12. Panel Chair