RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02033 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed from “Triangle, Virginia” to 
“Boston, Massachusetts.” 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

The applicant makes no contentions. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in 
the grade of staff sergeant (E-5). 

 

The applicant’s enlistment documents reflect her HOR as 
“Triangle, Virginia.” 

 

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the 
Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of 
an error or an injustice. The applicant’s HOR is listed 
throughout her military records as “Triangle, Virginia.” The 
Joint Federal Travel Regulations (JFTR), Volume 1, Appendix A, 
states the Home of Record as the place recorded as the home of 
the individual at the time when enlisted, commissioned, 
appointed, inducted or ordered to active duty. 

 

The complete AFPC/DPSIPE evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 19 Jun 12, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). 
As of this date, no response has been received by this office. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice. We took 
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and adopt its rationale as the basis for decision the applicant 
is not the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-02033 in Executive Session on 17 Jan 13, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 Chair 

 Member 

 Member 

 


The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-02033 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 3 May 12. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSIPE, dated 28 May 12, w/atch. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Jun 12. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Chair