RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-02595
		COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His Fitness Assessments (FAs) dated 4 Oct 2010 and 27 Jul 2011 
be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

On Sep 2011, he was diagnosed with “exercise induced asthma,” 
and was not correctly profiled at the time of the FAs dated 
4 Oct 2010 and 27 Jul 2011.

In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his 
fitness history, and an extract from his medical records.

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in 
the grade of technical sergeant (TSgt, E-6).

________________________________________________________________

THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial.  DPSIM states that on 29 Jun 2012, 
a memorandum was sent to the applicant requesting additional 
documentation.  Specifically, copies of his AF Form 469, Duty 
Limiting Condition Report; AF Form 422, Notification of Air 
Force Member's Qualification Status; AF Form 108, Physical 
Fitness Education and Intervention Processing, copies of his 
signed fitness score sheet and fitness questionnaire.  The 
member did not provide the requested documentation.

After further review of his fitness history, DPSIM states that 
he had a passing FA dated 3 Jan 2011, which was in between his 
failed FAs dated 4 Oct 2010 and 27 Jul 2011.  He also passed his 
FA, dated 24 Oct 2011 while taking all four components of the 
FA.  On 18 Apr 2012, he failed his FA while taking all four 
components.  Three months later he was exempt from the cardio, 
push-up, and sit-up components of his FA dated 12 Jul 2012 and 
passed.

The complete DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit B.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 30 Oct 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded 
to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days.  As of 
this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit 
C).

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  After 
thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the 
applicant’s contentions, we are not persuaded the contested FAs 
are in error or unjust.  The medical documentation provided by 
the applicant is noted; however, it was rendered several months 
after the contested FAs.  As such, this evidence does not 
persuade us that he had a duty limiting condition that prevented 
his successful completion of the contested Fas.  Therefore, in 
the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend favorable consideration of his request..

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.

________________________________________________________________



The following members of the Board considered this application 
in Executive Session on 24 Jan 2013, under the provisions of AFI 
36-2603:

     XXXXXXX, Panel Chair
     XXXXXXX, Member
     XXXXXXX, Member

The following documentary evidence pertaining to Docket number 
BC-2012-02595 was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 11 Jun 2012, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 10 Oct 2012.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 Oct 2012.