RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02830 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) to his dependents. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was not briefed on the proper procedure for transferring his benefits prior to his retirement in June 2008. The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DPSIT recommends denial since the applicant retired effective 30 June 2008 and the program for the transfer of benefits was not effective until 1 August 2009. Title 38 USC, Chapter 33, Section 3319(f)(1) states, “an individual…may transfer such entitlement only while serving as a member of the armed forces when the transfer is executed.” The DPSIT complete evaluation is at Exhibit B. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 7 August 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit C). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. The applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-02830 in Executive Session on 11 February 2013, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Although XXX was the Panel Chair, in view of his sudden death, XXX is signing as Acting Panel Chair. The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-02830 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 2 July 2012, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 12 August 2012. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 7 August 2012.