RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-04621

		COUNSEL:  NONE 

		HEARING DESIRED: NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her Re-entry (RE) code of “2X” (1st Term, 2nd Term or Career AMN 
Not Selected under Selection Retention Process (SRP)) be changed 
to “1J” (Eligible To Reenlist-Elected Separation Or Discharge) 
to allow her to return to service.  

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

She was forced out through no fault of her own.  She received an 
honorable discharge, severance pay and benefits.  She wants the 
opportunity to serve her country once again and complete the 
remaining 10 years of service and retire.  She has two children 
to care for and after being out for a year, she finally got a 
job as a waitress.  

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. 

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 7 August 2001 
and was released on 31 May 2011 with an honorable character of 
service and was credited with 9 years, 9 months, and 24 days of 
active duty service.  

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application 
extracted from the applicant’s military personnel records are 
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate Air Force 
office of primary responsibility at Exhibit C.   

______________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

1.  AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial.  DPSOA states the applicant 
was discharged on 31 May 2011 under the FY11 AF Force Shaping 
Rollback Program and was authorized severance pay.  The 
applicant was identified as eligible for the rollback based on 
her being on the Control Roster.  However, being on the control 
roster only made her eligible for the Rollback; her commander 
made a conscious decision to separate the applicant under the 
Rollback guidance by non-selecting her for reenlistment; meaning 
she had to be separated and could not have stayed in the Air 
Force.  The applicant's supervisor non-recommended her on an AF 
IMT 418, Selective Reenlistment Program Consideration on 22 Feb 
2011 listing numerous disciplinary infractions and her commander 
non-selected her for reenlistment the same day.  The applicant 
acknowledged her non-selection on 22 Feb 2012 and rendered her 
intent not to appeal the decision on 25 Feb 2011.  

2.  AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the USAF, states that 
commanders have selective reenlistment selection or non-
selection authority.  The Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) 
considers the members Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) ratings, 
unfavorable information from any substantiated source, the 
airman's willingness to comply with Air Force standards and/or 
the airman's ability (or lack of) to meet required training and 
duty performance levels.  The applicant did not provide any 
proof of an error or injustice in reference to her RE code and 
her non-selection was in accordance with current guidance.  

The complete AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 14 December 2012 for review and comment within 
30 days.  To date, a response has not been received. 

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.  

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not 
been the victim of an error or injustice.  Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application 
in Executive Session on 27 June 2013, under the provisions of 
AFI 36-2603:

			, Panel Chair
			, Member
			, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR 
Docket Number BC-2012-04621:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149 dated 3 October 2012.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 30 November 2012.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 December 2012. 








Dear:

	Reference your application submitted under the provisions of AFI 36-2603 (Section 1552, 
10 USC), AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-04621. 

	After careful consideration of your application and military records, the Board determined 
that the evidence you presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice.  
Accordingly, the Board denied your application.

	You have the right to submit newly discovered relevant evidence for consideration by the 
Board.  In the absence of such additional evidence, a further review of your application is not 
possible.

	BY DIRECTION OF THE PANEL CHAIR




Attachment:
Record of Board Proceedings



 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON, DC


Office of the Assistant Secretary


DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE