RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04676 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be authorized payment for a do it yourself (DITY) move based on the estimated weight. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He performed a DITY move for his family prior to receiving retirement orders. There was no time to obtain orders as his father was terminally ill. He was forced to request approval for a waiver to facilitate rapid out-processing. He requests reimbursement of the expenses incurred for the DITY move 18 days prior to receiving official orders. In support of the appeal, the applicant provides a personal statement, a MYPERS print-out and a physician’s note. The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant retired from the Air Force on 1 October 2012. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force which is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: PPA HQ/ECAF recommends denial. The Joint Federal Travel Regulation (JFTR) advises that in order for household goods to be authorized prior to the issuance of an order, a statement from the PCS ordering official advising that an order would be issued, written agreement signed by the applicant to pay any additional costs incurred for transportation to another point if the permanent duty station is changed, and a written agreement signed by the applicant to pay the entire transportation cost if a PCS order is not later issued to authorize the transportation. The requirements reflected in the JFTR to allow transportation authorization prior to the issuance of orders were not met. The applicant has not provided evidence to support a probable error or injustice. The complete ECAF evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 14 December 2012, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, this office has not received a response. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an injustice. We note the applicant contends he procured his move prior to the issuance of orders since there was insufficient time to obtain orders as his father was terminally ill. Consequently, he was not entitled to reimbursement for any expenses he incurred for the DITY move as the governing regulation requires prior transportation authorization. After a careful review of all the facts and circumstances of this case, to include the supporting statement from the physician who treated the applicant’s father, we believe it is in the interest of justice to afford the applicant the requested relief. Accordingly, we recommend his records be corrected as indicated below. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 19 July 2012, he was authorized by competent authority to make a self-procured move and he is entitled incentive payment in the amount of $8,133.02. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-04676 in Executive Session on 23 July 2013, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 29 Sep 12, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. PPA HQ/ECAF, Letter, dated 10 Dec 12. Exhibit D. SAF/MRBR, Letter, dated 14 Dec 12.