RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04699 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His AF Form 7, Airman Military Record, be corrected to reflect he was on Temporary Duty (TDY) to Udorn Thailand and Ton Son Nhut, Vietnam from 19 May 1966 – 11 August 1966. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His AF Form 7 states that he was TDY to SEA (Southeast Asia) for 85 days. He was assigned to Limelight 138. The record should reflect he was in Thailand and Vietnam. In support of his appeal, the applicant submits his AF Form 7 and his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is a former member of the Regular Air Force who served from 4 September 1963 through 1 September 1967. The AF Form 7 reflects he served in Okinawa from 23 December 1965 through 12 December 1966. It also reflects he was TDY to SEA from 19 May 1966 through 11 August 1966. On 8 January 2013, the case was administratively closed at the applicant’s request. It was reopened on 5 March 2013. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial. A review of the applicant’s Master Personnel Records substantiates he was TDY to Southeast Asia, unfortunately there is no evidence of the exact location. The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In order for him to apply for health benefits from the Department of Veteran’s Affairs, he has to prove that he was in Vietnam and Thailand. He was stationed at Kadena Air Force Base and his records confirm he was TDY to SEA. The applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. After a thorough review of the applicant’s submission in judging the merits of the case, we are not persuaded that a change in the record is warranted. The facts and opinions stated in the Air Force advisory appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been adequately rebutted by the applicant. Therefore, we agree with AFPC/DPAPP and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that there is no error or injustice in the record. While we are sympathetic to the applicant’s circumstance, in the absence of persuasive evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-04699 in Executive Session on 11 July 2013, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dtd 3 Oct 12, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dtd 24 Nov 12. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dtd 14 Dec 12. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant’s Response, dtd 14 Jan 13, w/atchs.