RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05239 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Honorable discharge be changed to reflect he was retired for physical disability. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He should have been medically retired due to his traumatic brain injury (TBI) and bi-polar disorder. There was a failure to schedule a required follow-up CT scan and mental health appointments after an injury he sustained in 2005 that resulted in him being in a coma. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant’s military personnel records indicate he enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 13 Nov 97. On 16 Nov 09, the applicant was released from active duty with an honorable character of service and issued a reentry code of 2X (First Term, Second Term, or Career Airman nonselected for reenlistment). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s complete submission, we are not convinced he is the victim of an error or injustice. While the applicant contends he did not receive the required medical care after an injury he sustained in 2005 that resulted in him being in a coma, he has provided no evidence whatsoever for us to consider in evaluating his request. Therefore, we conclude the evidence presented is not sufficient to overcome the presumption of regularity in the conduct of government affairs which, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, requires us to presume that his discharge was carried-out in accordance with the provisions of the prescribing instruction and was within the discretion of the discharge authority. Accordingly, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-05239 in Executive Session on 18 Jul 13, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 22 Oct 12. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Panel Chair