RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05344 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His home of record (HOR) on his latest DD Form 4/1, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States, be corrected to reflect San Antonio, Texas (TX) and his place of enlistment/reenlistment be corrected to reflect Randolph AFB, TX. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The service representative for the Mission Support Section incorrectly input his residence and installation at the time of his reenlistment. It was recommended that he review this document before retiring. He should have had this corrected prior to signing the document. In support of his appeal, the applicant submits the DD Form 4/1, DD Form 4/2, AF IMT 901, Reenlistment Eligibility Annex to DD Form 4, Enlisted Surf and his W-2, Wage and Tax Statement. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is a member of the Air Force serving in the grade of master sergeant. His original DD Form 4/1, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States, reflects Temple Hills, Maryland as his home of record at the time of his enlistment. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial. AFI 36-2608, Military Personnel Records System, states the DD Form 4/1 is the source document for the home of record. The applicant’s records reflect Maryland as the home of record/place of enlistment from his first enlistment dated 15 March 1993. The most recent enlistment is 4 June 2007; he has been in the Air Force for 19 years. The Joint Federal Travel Regulation for Uniformed Service Members Appendix A states the home of record is the place recorded as the home of the individual when commissioned, appointed, enlisted, inducted or ordered into a tour of active duty. Any correction made to a member’s home of record must be fully justified and the home, as corrected, must be the member’s actual home upon entering the service, and not a different place selected for the member’s convenience. There is no error or justification that warrants a change in the member’s home of record. The complete DPSIPE evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 11 January 2013, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, this office has received no response. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. The applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, he has provided no evidence which would lead us to believe his home of record or his place of entry currently reflected in his records were incorrectly recorded at the time he initially came on active duty. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-05344 in Executive Session on 1 August 2013, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 6 Nov 12, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIPE, dated 19 Dec 12, w/atch. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Jan 13.