RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05638 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 12 September 2012 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The individual counting his sit-up repetitions reported the incorrect number of sit-ups to the Fitness Assessment Cell (FAC). The counter reported 35; however, during the FA he asked the counter how many repetitions had he counted and he indicated 45. Knowing that 41 was the minimum number of sit-ups he had to complete to receive points in that category, he stopped due to muscle fatigue. In support of the applicant’s appeal, he provides a personal statement and a report of individual fitness. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ _ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in the grade of senior airman. The applicant’s last five FA scores are as follows: COMPOSITE DATE SCORE RATING 12 August 2010 84.50 SATISFACTORY 8 March 2011 87.00 SATISFACTORY 8 September 2011 90.20 EXCELLENT * 12 September 2012 82.90 UNSATISFACTORY 19 September 2012 84.60 SATISFACTORY *Contested FA score. ________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. DPSIM states there is not enough evidence to indicate whether or not the counter provided the incorrect number of sit-ups during the 12 September 2012 FA. The applicant has failed to clearly demonstrate an error or injustice. The DPSIM complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 6 April 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit C). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. ________________________________________________________________ _ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the applicant's contentions, we are not persuaded the contested FA is in error or unjust. In this respect, we note the applicant has failed to provide any documentary evidence in support of his appeal. In view of the above and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. ________________________________________________________________ _ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ _ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-05638 in Executive Session on 12 September 2013, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 21 November 2012, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 1 April 2013, w/atchs. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 April 2013. 3