RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05655 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His fitness assessment (FA) recorded on 19 November 2012 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He has a documented medical condition which precluded him from achieving a passing score in a non-exempt portion of the fitness assessment. In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of a combined letter from his first sergeant and medical provider dated 5 December 2012. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in the grade of Technical Sergeant (TSgt), E-6. A resume of the applicant's FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating *19 Nov 12 22.40 Unsatisfactory 4 Apr 12 75.10 Satisfactory 1 Feb 12 74.80 Unsatisfactory 3 Nov 11 78.00 Unsatisfactory 20 Apr 11 78.80 Satisfactory 28 Oct 10 79.30 Satisfactory * Contested FA The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 1. AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. DPSIM states the evidence provided by the applicant was incomplete and not sufficient to support his claim. The applicant was unable to meet the minimum requirement for the run portion of the FA and achieved a composite score of 22.40, an unsatisfactory fitness level. He provided documentation from his First Sergeant requesting a determination of his medical condition. In the Medical Condition Determination for FA Test Failures memorandum, the health care provider acknowledged the applicant had a medical condition that precluded him from passing the FA. 2. The memorandum does not allow for clarification on the applicant's limitations. Additionally, the applicant did not provide an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, which is required to be completed when a medical condition impacts fitness activity or when an FA is due in accordance with AFI 36- 2905, Fitness Program, paragraph 1.18.3. There is no indication of what extent the medical condition affected the FA. It is unclear if the applicant should be exempted from one or more components, or the entire FA. The applicant provided no additional documentation to support his request. The complete AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 17 February 2013 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). To date, a response has not been received. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the applicant's contentions, we are not persuaded the contested FA is in error or unjust. The Medical Condition Determination memorandum from the medical provider is noted; however, in the absence of an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, it is unclear to what extent the medical condition affected his 19 November 2012 FA, therefore, we find insufficient evidence to warrant disturbing the record. However, should the applicant provide such evidence, we would be willing to reconsider his request. In view of the above and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 12 September 2013, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-05655: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dtd 5 Dec 2012, w/atch. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 11 Feb 2013, w/atch. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Feb 2013.