RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-05798
		COUNSEL: NONE
		HEARING DESIRED: NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her Fitness Assessments (FA) dated 29 Dec 11 and 26 Sep 12, be 
removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). 

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Her first FA failure was due to a sexual assault that occurred on 
11 Dec 11, and she was still recovering from the sustained 
injuries.  The second FA failure was due to her diagnosis of 
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) from the sexual assault.

The applicant did not provide any documentation in support of her 
request. 

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in 
the grade of senior airman. 

The following is a summary of the applicant’s previous FA scores:

Date  Cardio   AC (in)    Push-   Sit-   Composite  Fitness 
      Results  Score      Ups     Ups    Score	  Score Level

7/13  49.30    16.50      5.00    0.00   70.80      Unsat
12/12 55.30    15.20      8.30    6.00   84.80      Sat
9/12  46.90    16.50      7.50    3.00   73.90      Unsat
3/12  54.20    20.00      7.30    6.80   88.30      Sat
12/11 51.20    20.00      8.60    3.00   82.80      Unsat
9/11  46.90    20.00      8.10    0.00   75.00      Unsat
6/10  39.00    26.25      8.25    7.00   80.50      Good

Contested FAs.

_________________________________________________________________



AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial.  DPSIM states that the applicant 
has not clearly demonstrated an error or injustice.

DPSIM states that without any documentation to support her 
claim, they cannot determine the validity of the error or 
injustice. 

The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 19 Sep 13, for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit C).  As of this date, this office has not received a 
response.  

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.
 
2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the 
applicant has failed to sustain her burden that she has been the 
victim of an error of injustice.  Should she provide 
documentation to support her contentions, we would be willing to 
reconsider her request.  In view of the above and in the absence 
of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend 
granting the relief sought in this application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered BC-2012-05798 in 
Executive Session on 17 Dec 13, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:

			Panel Chair
			Member
      Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 8 Dec 12.
   Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 21 Aug 13.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Sep 13.




		
		Panel Chair