RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00064 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessments (FA) dated 7 Dec 12 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He experienced chronic chest pain while taking the FA test due to a history of Upper Respiratory Infections (URI). The FA results were updated in the AFFMS the same day; however, he was given five days to be seen by the base medical staff, which would allow his commander to void the test. In support of his request, the applicant provides an excerpt from his medical records. His complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ _ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in the grade of airman first class. The applicant’s last five FA scores are as follows: DATE RESULT 16 Dec 11 EXCELLENT * 7 Dec 12 UNSATISFACTORY 25 Jan 13 EXCELLENT * Contested FA test. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. The applicant did provide documentation stating he went to his medical provider on 7 Dec 12; however, there is no evidence that a medical condition precluded him from passing the FA. Furthermore, there is no documentation from his commander invalidating the 7 Dec 12 FA test. The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 24 Feb 13 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this office has received no response. ________________________________________________________________ _ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. ________________________________________________________________ _ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ _ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-00064 in Executive Session on 12 Dec 13, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 22 Dec 12, w/atchs. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 16 Sep 13. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 Sep 13. 3 4