RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00304 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. Her honorable discharge be overturned and she be placed back in the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR). 2. Her two non-selections for promotion to the grade of major be removed. 2. She be reinstated into the Air Force Reserve (USAFR). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She attempted to sign up for Squadron Officer School (SOS) by correspondence in order to complete her Professional Military Education (PME) requirements for promotion; however, ARPC advised her that she would have to be assigned to a unit. She never received formal notification following her second promotion board stating that she was passed over. Without knowledge of the pending discharge, she applied and was selected for an Air Reserve Technician (ART) position which would allow her to complete her requirements for promotion. In support of the appeal, the applicant provides copies of email correspondence; Calendar Year 2011 (CY11) Nonparticipating Reserve (NPR) Major Promotion Selection Board Eligibility Notification letter, dated 10 Dec 10; CY11 Major Promotion Selection Board Nonselect letter, dated 14 Apr 11; CY12 NPR Major Promotion Selection Board Eligibility Notification letter, dated 19 Dec 12, and various other documents. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 5 Jul 01, the applicant entered active duty in the Regular Air Force. She was progressively promoted to the grade of Captain, with an effective date and date of rank of 12 Jun 05. On 29 Sep 07, she was discharged from active duty and credited with 6 years, 2 months and 25 days of active duty service. On 30 Sep 07, the applicant was appointed as a Reserve of the Air Force officer and was assigned to the IRR. On 14 Mar 12, she was notified that as a result of her second deferral, in accordance with the governing law and Air Force policy, she would be discharged, effective 1 Oct 12. On 1 Oct 12, the applicant was discharged from all appointments in the USAF. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPB recommends denial and states, in part; the applicant was properly assigned, properly considered for promotion, and correctly discharged after failing selection for promotion. The applicant accepted separation pay and was required to be a member of the IRR for three years after her military service obligation expired (Title 10 U.S.C. Section 1174). She completed her three years on 18 May 12. She was considered but not selected for promotion by the CY11 NPR Major Promotion Selection Board, which convened 31 Jan 11, and the CY12 NPR Major Promotion Selection Board, which convened 23 Jan 12. The quota for these boards was one (l) for each competitive category. The complete DPB evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 24 Feb 13 for review and response. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force Reserve office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Additionally, we found the actions taken by the Air Force Reserve were in accordance with law and Air Force policy. In view of the above and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-00304 in Executive Session on 7 Nov 13, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Although Mr. XXXXXX chaired the panel, in view of his unavailability, Mr. XXXXX has signed as Acting Panel Chair. The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 26 Dec 12, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Available Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, ARPC/DPB, dated 11 Feb 13. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 24 Feb 13. 3 4