RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-00926
			COUNSEL:  NONE
			HEARING DESIRED: NO

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

The Fitness Assessments (FAs) dated 22 December 2010, 24 May 
2011, and 25 August 2011 be removed from the Air Force Fitness 
Management System (AFFMS).

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He had a medical condition that prevented him from meeting the 
minimum Air Force fitness standards during the contested time 
frame.

In support of the applicant’s appeal, he provides a memorandum 
from his commander dated 22 September 2011; Report of Individual 
Fitness prepared on 14 October 2012 and other documentation.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

________________________________________________________________
_

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in 
the grade of technical sergeant.

The applicant’s last eight FA scores are as follows:

		COMPOSITE
	DATE	SCORE		RATING

*	22 December 2010	72.67		UNSATISFACTORY
*	24 May 2011	68.67		UNSATISFACTORY
*	25 August 2011	72.33		UNSATISFACTORY
	 6 December 2011	77.78		SATISFACTORY
	29 June 2012	61.33		UNSATISFACTORY





	26 October 2012	78.33		SATISFACTORY
	 3 May 2013	33.33		UNSATISFACTORY
	 1 August 2013	33.33		UNSATISFACTORY

*Contested FA score.

________________________________________________________________
_

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial.  DPSIM states after a thorough 
review of the documentation provided by the applicant, there is 
insufficient evidence to support the applicant’s claim.  The 
applicant has not provided documentation from the unit commander 
indicating his/her decision to invalidate the FAs (IAW AFI 36-
2905 - AFGM2 dated 20 December 2010 – paragraph 13).

The DPSIM complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit 
B.

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 29 October 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was 
forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 
30 days (Exhibit C).  As of this date, no response has been 
received by this office. 

________________________________________________________________
_

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  After 
thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the 
applicant's contentions, we are not persuaded the contested FAs 
are in error or unjust.  In this respect, we note the letter 
from the applicant’s medical provider; however, the applicant 
did not provide documentation from the unit commander 
recommending the assessments be invalidated.  Therefore, we 
agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force 
office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the 
basis for our conclusion the applicant has failed to sustain his 
burden of proof of the existence of an error or injustice.  In 
view of the above and in the absence of evidence to the 
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief 
sought in this application.

________________________________________________________________
_

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.

________________________________________________________________
_

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-00926 in Executive Session on 12 December 2013, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:


The following documentary evidence was considered:

  Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 14 October 2012, w/atchs.
  Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 24 September 2013,
              w/atchs.
  Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 October 2013.