RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00978 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His discharge be amended to show his eligibility to accomplish a Post-9/11 GI Bill transfer of educational benefits (TEB) to his dependent daughter. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served in the Air Force for 24 years to include service during and after 9/11. While in the military he could not transfer the education benefits because his daughter was not old enough to attend college, however, she is old enough now and he would like to transfer the education benefits to her. The applicant did not provide any evidence in support of his request. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: According to copies of documents extracted from the Automated Records Management System (ARMS) the applicant is a former member of the Regular Air Force who served from 16 November 1982 through 15 November 1986, and from 13 February 1987 until his retirement on 1 March 2007. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial. DPSIT states the applicant retired on 1 March 2007. The program for Transfer of Educational Benefits started on 1 August 2009. Since 38 U.S.C., Chapter 33, § 3319 (f) (1) states that “an individual …may transfer such entitlement only while serving as a member of the armed forces when the transfer is executed,” they recommend denial. The complete DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 22 March 2013, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). To date, a response has not been received. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant's submission, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) that since the applicant retired prior to the implementation of the Post-9/11 GI Bill education program he is not eligible for this benefit and is not a victim of an error or injustice. In view of the above, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. 4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will materially add to our understanding of the issue(s) involved. Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 16 December 2013, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-00978: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 14 February 2013. Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 7 March 2013. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 22 March 2013.