RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01022 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits to his dependents. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: At the time of his retirement there were no provisions available under Veterans’ Education Assistance Program (VEAP) or the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) to transfer education benefits (TEB) to his dependent. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is a former Regular Air Force member who retired on 1 Nov 06. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The applicant retired on 1 Nov 6, well prior to the 1 Aug 09 effective date of the provisions of the Post-9/11 GI Bill program that allow educational benefits to be transferred to dependents. There is no evidence showing the applicant was not properly counseled in accordance with the law and Department of Defense (DoD) regulations. Service members of the Armed Forces who, on or after 1 Aug 09, eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, had at least six years of service on the date of election and agreed to serve (if applicable) a specified additional period from the date of election, may transfer unused Post-9/11 GI Benefits to their dependents. The transfer of such entitlements must be done while the service member is on active duty. The complete AFPC/DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 15 Mar 13, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. The applicant retired from active duty almost three years prior to the effective date of the provisions of the Post-9/11 GI Bill program that allow educational benefits to be transferred to dependents and he has provided no evidence whatsoever to indicate that he is the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-01022 in Executive Session on 16 Dec 13, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 23 Feb 13, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 1 Mar 13. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 Mar 13. Panel Chair